\nIn the vast sea of social media content, memes, and viral posts, few topics intrigue people as much as quick, eye-catching \u201cpersonality tests.\u201d You might have scrolled through your feed, stumbled upon an image with concentric circles, and read a bold claim: \u201cThe Number of Circles You See Determines If You\u2019re a Narcissist.\u201d Perhaps you paused and tried to count the circles, or maybe you shared it with friends, curious about their reactions. Whatever the case, this particular meme taps into a powerful and enduring human desire: the wish to understand ourselves, and perhaps to understand others as well.\n
Why do we give so much credence to a simple image that purports to measure something as complex as narcissism? In a world where personality quizzes, from the \u201cWhat Kind of Pizza Are You?\u201d variety to the more established Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, are endlessly shared, this question is worth asking. This article takes a deep dive into the nature of optical illusions, the psychological concept of narcissism, and the broader cultural fascination with quick-and-easy \u201ctests\u201d that promise to reveal who we really are. Ultimately, we will see that the meme in question is more entertainment than fact. Nonetheless, it opens a window into how people perceive, how illusions can fool us, and why we are so eager to believe that a single glance at a picture might unmask our innermost traits.\n
\n
By examining the context, background, and implications of this viral meme, we can better understand how illusions intersect with human psychology\u2014and why the question of narcissism is so deeply compelling in our modern, image-conscious era.\n
2. Understanding Optical Illusions
\nBefore we delve into the specifics of this circle meme, it helps to have a baseline understanding of optical illusions. Optical illusions have existed for centuries, captivating the human mind and providing insight into how we process visual information. These illusions occur when the external reality (the shapes, lines, and colors we see) conflicts with how our brain interprets that information. The result is often a surprising or puzzling experience in which we see something that doesn\u2019t match objective reality.\n
2.1 Types of Optical Illusions
\nOptical illusions can be broadly categorized into several types:\n
Literal Illusions: Images that differ from the objects that create them. For instance, a classic example is a depiction of a figure that looks like a duck from one perspective and a rabbit from another. The image is literally ambiguous.\n
Physiological Illusions: These result from excessive stimulation of the eyes or brain\u2014brightness, color, size, position, or movement. A well-known example is the \u201cgrid illusion,\u201d where you see gray spots at the intersections of a black-and-white grid.\n
Cognitive Illusions: These rely on our unconscious inferences about the world. Examples include the M\u00fcller-Lyer illusion, where two lines of equal length appear different because of the arrow-like tails at their ends.\n
2.2 Why We\u2019re Drawn to Illusions
\nWe are inherently drawn to illusions because they challenge our understanding of reality. They remind us that our brains do not merely record what is \u201cout there\u201d but actively interpret sensory data. The idea that something as basic as seeing can be \u201ctricked\u201d is both fascinating and unsettling, prompting us to share illusions widely and discuss them with friends. This interest lays the groundwork for why an optical illusion that claims to reveal something about our personality might be particularly compelling.\n
3. The Meme in Context: \u201cThe Number of Circles You See Determines If You\u2019re a Narcissist\u201d
\nThe image in question features concentric circles, with an accompanying caption that essentially states: \u201cThe Number of Circles You See Determines If You\u2019re a Narcissist.\u201d The layout is straightforward: multiple white circles on a black background, with a small circle or dot near the bottom-right. The suggestion is that your interpretation of how many circles are present\u2014whether you see one big circle, multiple concentric circles, or some other count\u2014somehow correlates with how narcissistic you are.\n
3.1 The Viral Appeal
\nThis meme is a perfect storm for going viral because it combines several potent elements:\n
Simplicity: It\u2019s just a picture of circles. Anyone can look at it in a second.\n
Bold Claim: Tying the illusion to narcissism is a provocative statement that piques curiosity.\n
Immediate Feedback: People can instantly \u201ctest\u201d themselves by looking at the image.\n
Shareability: Psychological quizzes or illusions are easy to share and invite friends to try.\n
3.2 Does It Have Any Basis in Science?
\nShort answer: No, not in the sense that the number of circles you see is in any way a validated measure of narcissism. Narcissism, as we will discuss in more detail, is a complex personality trait that requires careful assessment. This meme is more of an entertaining trick\u2014akin to those illusions where you see one shape, then someone points out a different shape you didn\u2019t notice before, and suddenly your perception shifts. It\u2019s captivating, but it doesn\u2019t diagnose personality disorders.\n
However, the meme touches on a broader phenomenon: the idea that illusions can be used to glean insights about personality. There are certain projective tests (like the famous Rorschach Inkblot Test) that have been used in clinical settings. Yet, these are controversial and have specific methodologies that go far beyond a single glance at an image. This meme drastically oversimplifies the concept.\n
4. Defining Narcissism: Clinical Versus Colloquial
\nTo fully appreciate the meme\u2019s claim, we need to understand what narcissism actually is\u2014and the difference between a clinical definition and the colloquial usage of the term.\n
4.1 Clinical Narcissism
\nIn clinical psychology, narcissism is associated with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), a condition outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Key characteristics include:\n
A grandiose sense of self-importance\n
A preoccupation with fantasies of success, power, brilliance, or ideal love\n
A need for excessive admiration\n
A sense of entitlement\n
Interpersonally exploitative behavior\n
Lack of empathy\n
Envy of others or the belief that others are envious of them\n
Arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes\n
To be diagnosed with NPD, a person must exhibit a pervasive pattern of these traits across different contexts, leading to significant impairment in their personal or professional life.\n
4.2 Colloquial Narcissism
\nIn everyday speech, we often call someone \u201cnarcissistic\u201d if they come across as self-centered, vain, or obsessed with their appearance and achievements. The term can be thrown around loosely whenever someone posts too many selfies or constantly talks about themselves. While some individuals who do these things might have narcissistic traits, it doesn\u2019t necessarily mean they meet the criteria for NPD.\n
4.3 The Danger of Oversimplification
\nThe meme\u2019s assertion\u2014that your interpretation of a circle-based optical illusion can reveal if you\u2019re a narcissist\u2014oversimplifies a deeply complex psychological construct. This is not to say that illusions or tests can\u2019t be fun or spark interesting conversation. But it\u2019s crucial to remember that diagnosing narcissism, or even labeling someone as narcissistic, requires far more than counting circles.\n
5. A Brief History of Personality Tests and Projective Measures
\nThough the circle meme is obviously not a legitimate psychological instrument, it does have roots in the broader context of projective tests and personality assessments that have long captivated both professionals and the public.\n
5.1 Early Beginnings
\nOne of the earliest forms of \u201cpersonality testing\u201d can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, with Hippocrates\u2019 theory of the four humors. Though not an \u201cillusion,\u201d it laid a foundation for thinking that internal dispositions could be discerned through observation\u2014albeit in a rudimentary way.\n
5.2 Projective Tests
\nProjective tests gained prominence in the early 20th century. These include:\n
Rorschach Inkblot Test: Individuals interpret ambiguous inkblots, revealing underlying emotions and thought patterns.\n
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): People create stories about ambiguous pictures, theoretically projecting their inner conflicts and desires onto the narrative.\n
These tests aim to bypass conscious defenses, tapping into deeper layers of the psyche. While widely used, they are also highly controversial, with critics questioning their reliability and validity.\n
5.3 Rise of Popular Personality Questionnaires
\nIn the latter half of the 20th century, more structured tests emerged, such as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), and the Big Five Personality Test (measuring Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism). These instruments rely on systematic questionnaires rather than illusions, though they still have their own sets of critiques.\n
5.4 Pop Psychology and Internet Quizzes
\nThe internet age ushered in a new era of quick, fun, and often scientifically dubious quizzes. From \u201cWhich Hogwarts House Are You In?\u201d to \u201cWhat Kind of Potato Are You?\u201d these quizzes are more about entertainment and self-reflection than serious psychological measurement. The circle meme fits snugly into this tradition, even if it\u2019s not labeled as a \u201cquiz.\u201d\n
6. How Perception May (or May Not) Reflect Personality
\nOne of the underlying claims of the circle meme is that what you perceive can reveal who you are. Is there any scientific basis for this idea? The answer is nuanced.\n
6.1 Perception as a Constructive Process
\nPerception is not passive; our brains construct our visual reality using available sensory data and prior knowledge. Individual differences\u2014such as attention, focus, or even mood\u2014can influence what we see in ambiguous or complex images.\n
6.2 Personality Influences on Perception
\nThere is some research suggesting that personality traits can slightly influence how we interpret ambiguous stimuli. For example, individuals high in neuroticism might be more likely to perceive threatening elements in ambiguous images. However, these correlations tend to be small, and the stimuli are usually carefully designed for controlled experiments\u2014unlike a random circle meme on social media.\n
6.3 The Limits of a Single Image
\nEven in professional settings, multiple tests and observations are necessary to draw any conclusions about personality. A single glance at an optical illusion is unlikely to yield a robust measure of narcissism\u2014or any other trait. The circle meme\u2019s claim is more akin to a fun party trick than a scientifically validated approach.\n
7. Examining the \u201cCircle Illusion\u201d Step by Step\n
Let\u2019s now take a closer look at the specific image behind the meme. In it, we see multiple concentric circles, all of which share a single center. Depending on how you focus, you might see:\n
A Single Circle: If your eye is drawn to the outermost circle, you might perceive the entire image as one big shape with a dot near the edge.\n
Multiple Concentric Circles: If you look carefully, you might count seven, eight, or more circles.\n
A Large Circle with a Small Circle: Some might see the outer ring as one circle and interpret the smaller ring in the middle as another circle, and so on.\n
The meme then typically claims something along the lines of: \u201cIf you see X number of circles, you\u2019re normal, but if you see Y number of circles, you\u2019re a narcissist.\u201d The exact numbers can vary, depending on which version of the meme is circulating. Often, it is structured to pique curiosity or spark a reaction\u2014people want to know if they \u201cpassed\u201d or if they should be alarmed.\n
7.1 What\u2019s Really Happening?
\nWhat\u2019s happening is that the image can be perceived in different ways based on your focus, attention, and perhaps even your screen size or the device you\u2019re using. If you\u2019re on a small phone screen, you might not distinguish every single ring as easily as someone viewing it on a larger monitor. Lighting conditions, screen brightness, and even how quickly you scroll past the image all affect what you perceive.\n
None of these factors are indicative of narcissism. They\u2019re simply quirks of visual processing.\n
8. The Role of Expectation, Suggestion, and Cognitive Bias\n
A significant part of why people might be inclined to believe this meme lies in the power of suggestion. When we\u2019re told that a certain perception reveals something about our personality, we may look for confirmation. This is related to several well-known cognitive biases:\n
8.1 Confirmation Bias
\nConfirmation bias is the tendency to seek out, interpret, and remember information that confirms one\u2019s preconceptions. If you suspect you might be a bit self-centered, you might see fewer circles, read the meme\u2019s explanation, and conclude, \u201cYes, this confirms I\u2019m narcissistic.\u201d Conversely, if you see multiple circles and the meme claims that indicates you\u2019re empathetic, you might happily accept it as confirmation of your generous nature.\n
8.2 The Barnum Effect
\nThe Barnum Effect describes how people tend to accept vague, general statements as uniquely applicable to themselves. For instance, if the meme says, \u201cIf you see 8 circles, you\u2019re a natural leader who cares about others but also has high self-esteem,\u201d many people might feel it applies to them, regardless of their actual personality traits.\n
8.3 The Power of Viral Labels
\nIn a social media environment, labels can be powerful. When an image claims you are \u201cnarcissistic\u201d or \u201caltruistic\u201d based on a quick glance, it leverages the human propensity for labeling and classification. These labels can stick, even if they are grounded in nothing more than a catchy headline.\n
9. Common Myths and Misconceptions About Optical Illusions and Personality\n
Let\u2019s address some common misconceptions head-on:\n
Myth: \u201cIf an optical illusion looks a certain way to you, it reveals your personality.\u201d\n
Reality: Optical illusions generally reveal more about how visual processing works than about who you are as a person.\n
Myth: \u201cProjective tests like the Rorschach Inkblot are foolproof for diagnosing mental health conditions.\u201d\n
Reality: These tests are controversial, and any assessment of mental health or personality usually requires multiple methods of evaluation.\n
Myth: \u201cSeeing something different from your friends means something is wrong with you.\u201d\n
Reality: Individual differences in perception are normal and often influenced by context, attention, and other factors unrelated to personality.\n
Myth: \u201cA single glance at an illusion can replace a thorough psychological assessment.\u201d\n
Reality: Clinical assessments require structured interviews, validated questionnaires, and professional judgment.\n
10. Social Media, Virality, and the Spread of Psychological \u201cQuizzes\u201d\n
The internet is awash with quizzes, memes, and illusions that promise to reveal deep truths about who we are. This phenomenon is not surprising given how easily shareable and accessible such content can be. With a click of a button, you can pass the content on to hundreds or thousands of people.\n
10.1 The Appeal of Quick Answers
\nModern life can be hectic. Many of us yearn for shortcuts\u2014especially when it comes to self-knowledge. The idea that we can learn something important about ourselves in mere seconds is alluring. Social media amplifies this allure by giving us immediate feedback from peers in the form of likes, comments, and shares.\n
10.2 The Role of Algorithms\n
Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok use algorithms to promote content that generates engagement. Quizzes and illusions are particularly engaging, encouraging users to linger, comment, and share. This high engagement means the algorithms are more likely to push such content to a broader audience, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.\n
10.3 The Risk of Misinformation
\nThe downside is that such content can easily spread misinformation about mental health and personality. While it\u2019s usually harmless fun, it can sometimes trivialize serious psychological conditions or perpetuate myths about how these conditions are diagnosed.\n
11. Narcissism in the Modern World: A Cultural Perspective
\nNarcissism, as a concept, has gained immense traction in popular discourse, especially in the era of social media and selfies. Many articles and pundits have argued that we\u2019re living in an age of heightened narcissism, pointing to the rise of influencer culture, personal branding, and constant self-promotion online.\n
11.1 Selfies, Social Media, and Narcissism
\nTaking selfies or having a social media presence does not inherently make someone narcissistic. However, there is ongoing debate about whether the constant need for validation through likes and comments fosters narcissistic traits. Researchers have found correlations between excessive social media use and certain self-focused behaviors, but correlation does not always mean causation.\n
11.2 Healthy Self-Love vs. Pathological Narcissism
\nIn some ways, society encourages a degree of \u201chealthy narcissism\u201d\u2014the belief in oneself, confidence, and a desire to present oneself positively. Problems arise when self-focus becomes extreme, impairing relationships and leading to exploitative behavior. The meme capitalizes on the general anxiety around being \u201ctoo self-involved,\u201d tapping into our fear of being labeled a narcissist.\n
12. The Science (and Pseudoscience) of Online Personality Quizzes
\nOnline personality quizzes occupy a gray area between genuine self-reflection tools and outright pseudoscience. While some quizzes are based on reputable psychological models, many are not.\n
12.1 The Allure of Personality Typing
\nWe like to categorize things, including ourselves. Personality quizzes give us neat labels that can feel comforting or enlightening. Whether we\u2019re labeled \u201cThe Advocate\u201d (in the MBTI system) or a \u201cRed\u201d personality (in a color-based quiz), the label can help us articulate how we see ourselves.\n
12.2 The Problem of Validity
\nA test\u2019s validity refers to whether it measures what it claims to measure. Many online quizzes fail basic criteria of psychological testing, including:\n
Reliability: Consistency of results over time.\n
Construct Validity: Whether the test truly measures the trait it claims to measure.\n
Predictive Validity: Whether the test predicts real-world outcomes.\n
For something like the circle meme, there is no established reliability or validity\u2014it\u2019s merely an optical illusion repurposed for clickbait.\n
13. Beyond the Meme: Real Indicators of Narcissistic Traits
\nIf you\u2019re genuinely concerned about narcissism\u2014either in yourself or someone else\u2014what should you look for? While self-diagnosis is never a good idea, there are some behaviors and attitudes commonly associated with narcissistic traits:\n
Chronic Need for Admiration: Constantly seeking praise, fishing for compliments, and becoming upset if not recognized.\n
Lack of Empathy: Difficulty understanding or caring about other people\u2019s feelings.\n
Grandiosity: Inflated sense of importance, feeling unique or \u201cspecial\u201d beyond ordinary bounds.\n
Entitlement: Expecting special treatment or compliance from others without reciprocation.\n
Interpersonal Exploitation: Using others to achieve personal goals.\n
Arrogance: Demonstrating haughty or disdainful attitudes.\n
These signs are more meaningful indicators than how many circles you see in an image. Still, only a qualified mental health professional can properly evaluate these traits in context.\n
14. Healthy Narcissism vs. Pathological Narcissism
\nIt\u2019s also important to distinguish between healthy narcissism and pathological narcissism. Healthy narcissism includes aspects like self-confidence, resilience, and the ability to assert oneself. It becomes pathological when it is rigid, pervasive, and causes significant distress or impairment in functioning.\n
14.1 Balancing Self-Interest and Empathy
\nWe all have moments when we prioritize our own needs, and that doesn\u2019t necessarily mean we\u2019re narcissistic. Healthy personalities can oscillate between self-focus and other-focus. Pathological narcissists struggle to empathize, maintain healthy relationships, or recognize others\u2019 perspectives.\n
14.2 Cultural Influences
\nSome cultures may place a higher value on individual achievement and self-expression, which can appear narcissistic to outsiders. The line between cultural norms and pathological behavior can sometimes be blurred, emphasizing the need for careful, context-sensitive evaluation.\n
15. Why We Love (and Love to Hate) Personality \u201cTests\u201d
\nFrom the Rorschach to BuzzFeed quizzes, personality tests have always intrigued us. Why is that?\n
Self-Discovery: We crave understanding of who we are.\n
Validation: We like receiving \u201cpositive\u201d labels that make us feel good.\n
Social Bonding: Sharing quiz results can foster connections, spark conversation, and even create friendly competition.\n
Simplicity: Life is complex; a quiz offers a neat, digestible answer\u2014whether it\u2019s accurate or not.\n
At the same time, many of us recognize that these quizzes oversimplify and may lead to stereotypes or superficial judgments.\n
16. Ethical and Psychological Considerations
\nEven though the circle meme is mostly harmless fun, it raises broader questions about how we discuss mental health and personality online.\n
16.1 Stigmatization
\nLabeling someone as a \u201cnarcissist\u201d based on a meme can contribute to the stigmatization of mental health conditions. People with Narcissistic Personality Disorder already face challenges in seeking help; oversimplified memes may trivialize or misrepresent their experiences.\n
16.2 Oversimplification of Complex Disorders
\nSerious personality disorders involve intricate interplay between genetics, upbringing, trauma, and other factors. Reducing them to an illusion test not only misinforms the public but also can lead to harmful misconceptions.\n
16.3 Consent and Confidentiality
\nOnline quizzes often require users to share data or personal information. While the circle meme doesn\u2019t collect data, many other \u201ctests\u201d do, sometimes without clear disclosure. Users should always be cautious about what they share.\n
17. What Really Shapes Our Perception?
\nThe circle meme, at its core, is about perception\u2014how many circles do you see? But the bigger question is: Why do we see what we see, and how does that relate to who we are?\n
17.1 Sensory Input and Brain Processing
\nOur eyes capture light reflected from objects, which is then converted into neural signals. These signals travel to the visual cortex, where they are processed. Along the way, our brains apply rules, heuristics, and shortcuts, which can lead to illusions.\n
17.2 Attention and Context
\nWe might \u201csee\u201d fewer circles if we\u2019re quickly scrolling or if we\u2019re distracted. Context matters. If someone told you beforehand that the image tests for how detail-oriented you are, you might spend more time carefully counting circles. This shift in attention could alter what you perceive.\n
17.3 Cognitive Styles
\nSome people are more detail-oriented, while others are more holistic in their approach to visual information. Neither style inherently correlates with narcissism, but it can explain differences in how we interpret illusions.\n
18. The Illusion of the Illusion
\nWhen you first encounter the meme proclaiming, \u201cThe Number of Circles You See Determines If You\u2019re a Narcissist,\u201d it\u2019s natural to be intrigued. After all, optical illusions are fun, and the claim is bold. But as we\u2019ve explored in this extensive article, the truth is far more nuanced\u2014and, in some ways, more interesting.\n
Optical Illusions: They reveal the complexities of our visual systems, not hidden facets of our personality.\n
Narcissism: A multifaceted personality trait (and potential disorder) that cannot be measured by a single glance at a meme.\n
Personality Tests: While some are scientifically grounded, many are not. The circle meme is certainly in the \u201cnot\u201d category.\n
Social Media: It amplifies and perpetuates content that is easily digestible, leading to the viral spread of memes like this one.\n
Cognitive Biases: Confirmation bias, the Barnum Effect, and the allure of quick answers fuel our interest in such illusions.\n
Healthy Skepticism: A necessary tool in navigating the deluge of online quizzes and viral memes, especially when they claim to reveal psychological truths.\n
Ultimately, the circle meme is best viewed as a conversation starter or a momentary diversion rather than a genuine diagnostic tool. It taps into our collective fascination with illusions and personality but, like many internet memes, oversimplifies complex psychological constructs for the sake of virality.\n
So, how many circles did you see? The answer might tell you something about your visual processing, your level of attention, or even your screen brightness\u2014but it won\u2019t diagnose you as a narcissist. Instead, consider the meme a playful reminder that human perception is wonderfully intricate, and our personalities are far too rich and multifaceted to be captured by a single image.\n
In the end, the real lesson is about the illusion of the illusion: the idea that a fun internet test can define who we are. As much as we might wish for a quick glimpse into our deepest traits, true self-understanding comes from ongoing introspection, open-mindedness, and, when needed, the guidance of trained professionals. Let the circles be a portal into wonder rather than a prison of labels. And the next time you see a meme that claims to reveal your personality at a glance, enjoy it for what it is\u2014a playful trick of the mind\u2014and keep in mind the bigger picture of what truly shapes our thoughts, behaviors, and identities.\n
No single test\u2014especially one derived from a viral meme\u2014can accurately measure your mental health or personality. If you have concerns about narcissism or any other psychological issue, consider seeking professional advice. Mental health is complex, and it deserves far more than a momentary glance at an optical illusion on social media. By approaching such memes with curiosity but also critical thinking, we can enjoy the fun without falling for the illusion.\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In the vast sea of social media content, memes, and viral posts, few topics intrigue people as much as quick, eye-catching \u201cpersonality tests.\u201d You might have scrolled through your feed, stumbled upon an image with concentric circles, and read a bold claim: \u201cThe Number of Circles You See Determines If You\u2019re a Narcissist.\u201d Perhaps you\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":122174,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[232],"tags":[369],"class_list":{"0":"post-122138","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-quiz","8":"tag-games-quizz-hiddenobjects-challenge"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/no-circle.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122138"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122138\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":122175,"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122138\/revisions\/122175"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/122174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorevista.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}